<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows 7 vs Ubuntu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://martinnotes.com/2009/01/11/windows-7-vs-ubuntu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://martinnotes.com/2009/01/11/windows-7-vs-ubuntu/</link>
	<description>Open source in real life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 05:30:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Koch</title>
		<link>http://martinnotes.com/2009/01/11/windows-7-vs-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-1107</link>
		<dc:creator>David Koch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 06:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinnotes.com/?p=203#comment-1107</guid>
		<description>Your article is absolutely spot on. Sadly, no matter how superior an OS is, and Ubuntu really is better than Win7, until it gets a big enough following you will always have issues regarding app and driver support or games for it and so forth. But if you feel happy to work around this there are ways to cope and it is up to you to decide if you feel the time wasted on work arounds is justified by the time gained by using a much faster and more stable system.

I see Valve has releasing Steam for Mac. Let&#039;s put some pressure on them to have a look at some big Distros like Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora and Suse. If games start coming to Linux, I think there will be a lot of user movement which in turn will bring hardware vendors and application writers to the party.

Thanks for the interesting read.
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your article is absolutely spot on. Sadly, no matter how superior an OS is, and Ubuntu really is better than Win7, until it gets a big enough following you will always have issues regarding app and driver support or games for it and so forth. But if you feel happy to work around this there are ways to cope and it is up to you to decide if you feel the time wasted on work arounds is justified by the time gained by using a much faster and more stable system.</p>
<p>I see Valve has releasing Steam for Mac. Let&#8217;s put some pressure on them to have a look at some big Distros like Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora and Suse. If games start coming to Linux, I think there will be a lot of user movement which in turn will bring hardware vendors and application writers to the party.</p>
<p>Thanks for the interesting read.<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://martinnotes.com/2009/01/11/windows-7-vs-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-1097</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinnotes.com/?p=203#comment-1097</guid>
		<description>Sorry Ubuntu fans, I switched: http://martinnotes.com/2010/03/14/windows-7-vs-ubuntu-the-sequal/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Ubuntu fans, I switched: <a href="http://martinnotes.com/2010/03/14/windows-7-vs-ubuntu-the-sequal/" rel="nofollow">http://martinnotes.com/2010/03/14/windows-7-vs-ubuntu-the-sequal/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows 7 vs Vista vs Ubuntu &#171; Idzme&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://martinnotes.com/2009/01/11/windows-7-vs-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-1096</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows 7 vs Vista vs Ubuntu &#171; Idzme&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinnotes.com/?p=203#comment-1096</guid>
		<description>[...] Windows 7 vs Ubuntu [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Windows 7 vs Ubuntu [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evans</title>
		<link>http://martinnotes.com/2009/01/11/windows-7-vs-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-1093</link>
		<dc:creator>Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinnotes.com/?p=203#comment-1093</guid>
		<description>Ubuntu looks beautiful but microsoft windows rocks. It has been, still is and will be the best OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ubuntu looks beautiful but microsoft windows rocks. It has been, still is and will be the best OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://martinnotes.com/2009/01/11/windows-7-vs-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-1092</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinnotes.com/?p=203#comment-1092</guid>
		<description>In windows &quot;there is an app for everything&quot;. All the games come out for windows. Ubuntu and other linux/unix based systems don&#039;t have a lot of apps and absolutely no games. So i think for ubuntu or fedora to compete with the heavy weight champion it has to talk to the big companies (eidos,ea,activision, even MS) so that they can develop some nice apps and games for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In windows &#8220;there is an app for everything&#8221;. All the games come out for windows. Ubuntu and other linux/unix based systems don&#8217;t have a lot of apps and absolutely no games. So i think for ubuntu or fedora to compete with the heavy weight champion it has to talk to the big companies (eidos,ea,activision, even MS) so that they can develop some nice apps and games for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hfdibfv</title>
		<link>http://martinnotes.com/2009/01/11/windows-7-vs-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-1089</link>
		<dc:creator>hfdibfv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinnotes.com/?p=203#comment-1089</guid>
		<description>All your points basically prove that ubuntu is better. ubuntu rocks. cant wait for lucid lynx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All your points basically prove that ubuntu is better. ubuntu rocks. cant wait for lucid lynx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://martinnotes.com/2009/01/11/windows-7-vs-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-1088</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinnotes.com/?p=203#comment-1088</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll always keep using Ubuntu, but it is challenging. I&#039;m using it on my laptop for work and I&#039;m required to have WinXP on the laptop to be able to use Office and Outlook with Exchange. The alternatives that Ubuntu offers are just not good enough (OpenOffice) or not working at all (Evolution  Exchange).

I really like Ubuntu because it&#039;s fast and configurable, but using it in a real life environment requires some determination. Apple has done it&#039;s best to integrate with the Microsoft world and they&#039;re doing quite a good job. Linux is still running behind in that sense and probably always will.

Using Ubuntu without the rest of the world is just great. But as soon as you start receiving MS Word documents, Powerpoints, Visios, Enterprise Architect documents, or own an iPhone or Apple TV then life becomes complicated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll always keep using Ubuntu, but it is challenging. I&#8217;m using it on my laptop for work and I&#8217;m required to have WinXP on the laptop to be able to use Office and Outlook with Exchange. The alternatives that Ubuntu offers are just not good enough (OpenOffice) or not working at all (Evolution  Exchange).</p>
<p>I really like Ubuntu because it&#8217;s fast and configurable, but using it in a real life environment requires some determination. Apple has done it&#8217;s best to integrate with the Microsoft world and they&#8217;re doing quite a good job. Linux is still running behind in that sense and probably always will.</p>
<p>Using Ubuntu without the rest of the world is just great. But as soon as you start receiving MS Word documents, Powerpoints, Visios, Enterprise Architect documents, or own an iPhone or Apple TV then life becomes complicated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isaac Close</title>
		<link>http://martinnotes.com/2009/01/11/windows-7-vs-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaac Close</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 00:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinnotes.com/?p=203#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>My pennies worth...

Millions of people now use Ubuntu and the number is growing rapidly every single day and will continue to do so.

Its irrelevant what I think or claim to know, what is important is _choice_ in the areas where once it seemed like there was none.

An easy to use, flexible, capable, robust and efficient system is now availible, for free to anyone who wants it, and plenty do.

Choose whatevers best for you.


ps. I prefer linux from scratch :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My pennies worth&#8230;</p>
<p>Millions of people now use Ubuntu and the number is growing rapidly every single day and will continue to do so.</p>
<p>Its irrelevant what I think or claim to know, what is important is _choice_ in the areas where once it seemed like there was none.</p>
<p>An easy to use, flexible, capable, robust and efficient system is now availible, for free to anyone who wants it, and plenty do.</p>
<p>Choose whatevers best for you.</p>
<p>ps. I prefer linux from scratch <img src='http://martinnotes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vaughan</title>
		<link>http://martinnotes.com/2009/01/11/windows-7-vs-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-1085</link>
		<dc:creator>Vaughan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinnotes.com/?p=203#comment-1085</guid>
		<description>Could all the people who are dissing Ubuntu (you know, saying that it is heavily terminal based etc) please download an iso, and install it and spend at least an hour using it.

99% of the things you want to do with an OS can be done out of the box, and the other 1% can be done after a quick google search on how to make it work. The terminal is there, and can be used IF YOU WANT TO. If you dont want to use the terminal then dont. Most linux users will use the terminal quite a lot once they know how though, as it is easier than a gui. Take installing a new software package under ubuntu. There is a gui application that allows you to search for the app you want, and install it. However if accustomed to the command line, the user can search for a software package and install it in 2 commands.

As for whoever said that every 30 boots (or so) the linux user needs to tweak their boot settings as it stops working, please if you have no idea please dont comment. If you had ever run ubuntu, or any linux distro for that matter, you would realise how stupid this comment it. Ive been running ubuntu for the last several years, and to be honest i bet i can count on my fingers the ammount of times ive had to reboot...  Try running windows (ANY version) without rebooting at least once a week..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could all the people who are dissing Ubuntu (you know, saying that it is heavily terminal based etc) please download an iso, and install it and spend at least an hour using it.</p>
<p>99% of the things you want to do with an OS can be done out of the box, and the other 1% can be done after a quick google search on how to make it work. The terminal is there, and can be used IF YOU WANT TO. If you dont want to use the terminal then dont. Most linux users will use the terminal quite a lot once they know how though, as it is easier than a gui. Take installing a new software package under ubuntu. There is a gui application that allows you to search for the app you want, and install it. However if accustomed to the command line, the user can search for a software package and install it in 2 commands.</p>
<p>As for whoever said that every 30 boots (or so) the linux user needs to tweak their boot settings as it stops working, please if you have no idea please dont comment. If you had ever run ubuntu, or any linux distro for that matter, you would realise how stupid this comment it. Ive been running ubuntu for the last several years, and to be honest i bet i can count on my fingers the ammount of times ive had to reboot&#8230;  Try running windows (ANY version) without rebooting at least once a week..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Marchetti</title>
		<link>http://martinnotes.com/2009/01/11/windows-7-vs-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-1084</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Marchetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinnotes.com/?p=203#comment-1084</guid>
		<description>&quot;Ubuntu has a lot of advantages too, i know, but i think, Linux will not be able to displace Windows. Linux(especially Ubuntu) isnt as user-friendly as itself says. It became better over the years, but never reached Windows.&quot;

What&#039;s interesting to think about is that it already is. Though Linux isn&#039;t ready for the average desktop user, it is right for nearly everybody else. Servers? Use Red Hat. Development? Use Slackware (or a derivative. I prefer Vector). Tech-enthusiast? Run Ubuntu (or, again, a derivative). 

Here&#039;s my thing with Windows: look how restricted you are. You can&#039;t use an alternate window manager. You can&#039;t customize your install. You can barely do any custom fixes (even then, those are mostly small hacks). Most people don&#039;t care. Power users do. That&#039;s why we use Linux.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ubuntu has a lot of advantages too, i know, but i think, Linux will not be able to displace Windows. Linux(especially Ubuntu) isnt as user-friendly as itself says. It became better over the years, but never reached Windows.&#8221;</p>
<p>What&#8217;s interesting to think about is that it already is. Though Linux isn&#8217;t ready for the average desktop user, it is right for nearly everybody else. Servers? Use Red Hat. Development? Use Slackware (or a derivative. I prefer Vector). Tech-enthusiast? Run Ubuntu (or, again, a derivative). </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my thing with Windows: look how restricted you are. You can&#8217;t use an alternate window manager. You can&#8217;t customize your install. You can barely do any custom fixes (even then, those are mostly small hacks). Most people don&#8217;t care. Power users do. That&#8217;s why we use Linux.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
