<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Martin Notes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://martinnotes.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://martinnotes.com</link>
	<description>Open source in real life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:50:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows 7 vs Ubuntu by Windows 7 vs Vista vs Ubuntu &#171; Idzme&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://martinnotes.com/2009/01/11/windows-7-vs-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-1096</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows 7 vs Vista vs Ubuntu &#171; Idzme&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinnotes.com/?p=203#comment-1096</guid>
		<description>[...] Windows 7 vs Ubuntu [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Windows 7 vs Ubuntu [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu, Chromium and Adobe Flash! by Evans</title>
		<link>http://martinnotes.com/2009/07/12/ubuntu-chromium-and-adobe-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-1094</link>
		<dc:creator>Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 05:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinnotes.com/?p=369#comment-1094</guid>
		<description>I just checked it on Ubuntu and it works. My preferred browser is chrome but due to the lack of flash support I wasn&#039;t using it but now I can enjoy browsing on chromium. Thanks for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just checked it on Ubuntu and it works. My preferred browser is chrome but due to the lack of flash support I wasn&#8217;t using it but now I can enjoy browsing on chromium. Thanks for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows 7 vs Ubuntu by Evans</title>
		<link>http://martinnotes.com/2009/01/11/windows-7-vs-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-1093</link>
		<dc:creator>Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinnotes.com/?p=203#comment-1093</guid>
		<description>Ubuntu looks beautiful but microsoft windows rocks. It has been, still is and will be the best OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ubuntu looks beautiful but microsoft windows rocks. It has been, still is and will be the best OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows 7 vs Ubuntu by Alex</title>
		<link>http://martinnotes.com/2009/01/11/windows-7-vs-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-1092</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinnotes.com/?p=203#comment-1092</guid>
		<description>In windows &quot;there is an app for everything&quot;. All the games come out for windows. Ubuntu and other linux/unix based systems don&#039;t have a lot of apps and absolutely no games. So i think for ubuntu or fedora to compete with the heavy weight champion it has to talk to the big companies (eidos,ea,activision, even MS) so that they can develop some nice apps and games for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In windows &#8220;there is an app for everything&#8221;. All the games come out for windows. Ubuntu and other linux/unix based systems don&#8217;t have a lot of apps and absolutely no games. So i think for ubuntu or fedora to compete with the heavy weight champion it has to talk to the big companies (eidos,ea,activision, even MS) so that they can develop some nice apps and games for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows 7 vs Ubuntu by hfdibfv</title>
		<link>http://martinnotes.com/2009/01/11/windows-7-vs-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-1089</link>
		<dc:creator>hfdibfv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinnotes.com/?p=203#comment-1089</guid>
		<description>All your points basically prove that ubuntu is better. ubuntu rocks. cant wait for lucid lynx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All your points basically prove that ubuntu is better. ubuntu rocks. cant wait for lucid lynx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows 7 vs Ubuntu by Martin</title>
		<link>http://martinnotes.com/2009/01/11/windows-7-vs-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-1088</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinnotes.com/?p=203#comment-1088</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll always keep using Ubuntu, but it is challenging. I&#039;m using it on my laptop for work and I&#039;m required to have WinXP on the laptop to be able to use Office and Outlook with Exchange. The alternatives that Ubuntu offers are just not good enough (OpenOffice) or not working at all (Evolution  Exchange).

I really like Ubuntu because it&#039;s fast and configurable, but using it in a real life environment requires some determination. Apple has done it&#039;s best to integrate with the Microsoft world and they&#039;re doing quite a good job. Linux is still running behind in that sense and probably always will.

Using Ubuntu without the rest of the world is just great. But as soon as you start receiving MS Word documents, Powerpoints, Visios, Enterprise Architect documents, or own an iPhone or Apple TV then life becomes complicated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll always keep using Ubuntu, but it is challenging. I&#8217;m using it on my laptop for work and I&#8217;m required to have WinXP on the laptop to be able to use Office and Outlook with Exchange. The alternatives that Ubuntu offers are just not good enough (OpenOffice) or not working at all (Evolution  Exchange).</p>
<p>I really like Ubuntu because it&#8217;s fast and configurable, but using it in a real life environment requires some determination. Apple has done it&#8217;s best to integrate with the Microsoft world and they&#8217;re doing quite a good job. Linux is still running behind in that sense and probably always will.</p>
<p>Using Ubuntu without the rest of the world is just great. But as soon as you start receiving MS Word documents, Powerpoints, Visios, Enterprise Architect documents, or own an iPhone or Apple TV then life becomes complicated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows 7 vs Ubuntu by Isaac Close</title>
		<link>http://martinnotes.com/2009/01/11/windows-7-vs-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaac Close</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 00:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinnotes.com/?p=203#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>My pennies worth...

Millions of people now use Ubuntu and the number is growing rapidly every single day and will continue to do so.

Its irrelevant what I think or claim to know, what is important is _choice_ in the areas where once it seemed like there was none.

An easy to use, flexible, capable, robust and efficient system is now availible, for free to anyone who wants it, and plenty do.

Choose whatevers best for you.


ps. I prefer linux from scratch :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My pennies worth&#8230;</p>
<p>Millions of people now use Ubuntu and the number is growing rapidly every single day and will continue to do so.</p>
<p>Its irrelevant what I think or claim to know, what is important is _choice_ in the areas where once it seemed like there was none.</p>
<p>An easy to use, flexible, capable, robust and efficient system is now availible, for free to anyone who wants it, and plenty do.</p>
<p>Choose whatevers best for you.</p>
<p>ps. I prefer linux from scratch <img src='http://martinnotes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows 7 vs Ubuntu by Vaughan</title>
		<link>http://martinnotes.com/2009/01/11/windows-7-vs-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-1085</link>
		<dc:creator>Vaughan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinnotes.com/?p=203#comment-1085</guid>
		<description>Could all the people who are dissing Ubuntu (you know, saying that it is heavily terminal based etc) please download an iso, and install it and spend at least an hour using it.

99% of the things you want to do with an OS can be done out of the box, and the other 1% can be done after a quick google search on how to make it work. The terminal is there, and can be used IF YOU WANT TO. If you dont want to use the terminal then dont. Most linux users will use the terminal quite a lot once they know how though, as it is easier than a gui. Take installing a new software package under ubuntu. There is a gui application that allows you to search for the app you want, and install it. However if accustomed to the command line, the user can search for a software package and install it in 2 commands.

As for whoever said that every 30 boots (or so) the linux user needs to tweak their boot settings as it stops working, please if you have no idea please dont comment. If you had ever run ubuntu, or any linux distro for that matter, you would realise how stupid this comment it. Ive been running ubuntu for the last several years, and to be honest i bet i can count on my fingers the ammount of times ive had to reboot...  Try running windows (ANY version) without rebooting at least once a week..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could all the people who are dissing Ubuntu (you know, saying that it is heavily terminal based etc) please download an iso, and install it and spend at least an hour using it.</p>
<p>99% of the things you want to do with an OS can be done out of the box, and the other 1% can be done after a quick google search on how to make it work. The terminal is there, and can be used IF YOU WANT TO. If you dont want to use the terminal then dont. Most linux users will use the terminal quite a lot once they know how though, as it is easier than a gui. Take installing a new software package under ubuntu. There is a gui application that allows you to search for the app you want, and install it. However if accustomed to the command line, the user can search for a software package and install it in 2 commands.</p>
<p>As for whoever said that every 30 boots (or so) the linux user needs to tweak their boot settings as it stops working, please if you have no idea please dont comment. If you had ever run ubuntu, or any linux distro for that matter, you would realise how stupid this comment it. Ive been running ubuntu for the last several years, and to be honest i bet i can count on my fingers the ammount of times ive had to reboot&#8230;  Try running windows (ANY version) without rebooting at least once a week..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows 7 vs Ubuntu by Adam Marchetti</title>
		<link>http://martinnotes.com/2009/01/11/windows-7-vs-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-1084</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Marchetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinnotes.com/?p=203#comment-1084</guid>
		<description>&quot;Ubuntu has a lot of advantages too, i know, but i think, Linux will not be able to displace Windows. Linux(especially Ubuntu) isnt as user-friendly as itself says. It became better over the years, but never reached Windows.&quot;

What&#039;s interesting to think about is that it already is. Though Linux isn&#039;t ready for the average desktop user, it is right for nearly everybody else. Servers? Use Red Hat. Development? Use Slackware (or a derivative. I prefer Vector). Tech-enthusiast? Run Ubuntu (or, again, a derivative). 

Here&#039;s my thing with Windows: look how restricted you are. You can&#039;t use an alternate window manager. You can&#039;t customize your install. You can barely do any custom fixes (even then, those are mostly small hacks). Most people don&#039;t care. Power users do. That&#039;s why we use Linux.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ubuntu has a lot of advantages too, i know, but i think, Linux will not be able to displace Windows. Linux(especially Ubuntu) isnt as user-friendly as itself says. It became better over the years, but never reached Windows.&#8221;</p>
<p>What&#8217;s interesting to think about is that it already is. Though Linux isn&#8217;t ready for the average desktop user, it is right for nearly everybody else. Servers? Use Red Hat. Development? Use Slackware (or a derivative. I prefer Vector). Tech-enthusiast? Run Ubuntu (or, again, a derivative). </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my thing with Windows: look how restricted you are. You can&#8217;t use an alternate window manager. You can&#8217;t customize your install. You can barely do any custom fixes (even then, those are mostly small hacks). Most people don&#8217;t care. Power users do. That&#8217;s why we use Linux.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows 7 vs Ubuntu by Arun</title>
		<link>http://martinnotes.com/2009/01/11/windows-7-vs-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-1083</link>
		<dc:creator>Arun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinnotes.com/?p=203#comment-1083</guid>
		<description>Regarding preinstalled s/w - remember Microsoft was in soup for just having a browser bundled with windows? Heavens might fall if it came with things like Office, even if they were crippled!
(PS: I use Mac at home and dabbling with Ubuntu at the moment)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding preinstalled s/w &#8211; remember Microsoft was in soup for just having a browser bundled with windows? Heavens might fall if it came with things like Office, even if they were crippled!<br />
(PS: I use Mac at home and dabbling with Ubuntu at the moment)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
