<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Martin Notes &#187; Enterprise 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://martinnotes.com/tag/enterprise-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://martinnotes.com</link>
	<description>Open source in real life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:44:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Open source  Enterprise 2.0?</title>
		<link>http://martinnotes.com/2008/05/04/open-source-enterprise-20/</link>
		<comments>http://martinnotes.com/2008/05/04/open-source-enterprise-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 19:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source community]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinnotes.com/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This thing has been in my mind for a long time now. There is a connection between the open source community and Enterprise 2.0. They both describe distibuted responsibility and the use of web 2.0 tooling. Look at the pages under: http://www.ubuntu.com/community/processes. This describes the organisation of the Ubuntu community. I&#8217;ve been reading this for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This thing has been in my mind for a long time now. There is a connection between the open source community and Enterprise 2.0. They both describe distibuted responsibility and the use of web 2.0 tooling.</p>
<p>Look at the pages under: <a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/community/processes">http://www.ubuntu.com/community/processes</a>. This describes the organisation of the Ubuntu community. I&#8217;ve been reading this for about an hour now and I&#8217;ve seen 10ths of things we can use in <a href="http://www.componence.com">Componence</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to do more research on this to find out how the settled enterprise can learn from the anarchistic open source community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://martinnotes.com/2008/05/04/open-source-enterprise-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enterprise 2.0</title>
		<link>http://martinnotes.com/2008/04/20/enterprise-20/</link>
		<comments>http://martinnotes.com/2008/04/20/enterprise-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 08:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hype]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mixedlife.com/blog/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a lot of talk lately about enterprise 2.0 in our company. It&#8217;s supposed to be the enterprise version of web 2.0, so: online collaboration, distributed content generation, distributed responsibilities, &#8230; This comes down to: wiki, blogging, but also a change in the company organisation. I think that real enterprise 2.0 doesn&#8217;t have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been a lot of talk lately about enterprise 2.0 in our company. It&#8217;s supposed to be the enterprise version of web 2.0, so: online collaboration, distributed content generation, distributed responsibilities, &#8230; This comes down to: wiki, blogging, but also a change in the company organisation.</p>
<p>I think that real enterprise 2.0 doesn&#8217;t have anything to do with technology, since all the technology was already there and it was already used. Enterprise 2.0 is about a change in mindset. Knowledge sharing has always been one of the major issues in enterprises. Componence (the company I work for) is not an enterprise, but we do work on 7 locations over the whole world. This means that our problem with knowledge sharing is in a way representative for larger companies.</p>
<p>Contact between employees is mostly through <a href="http://www.skype.com">Skype</a>. I&#8217;ve never been in a company where they are so happy when you have 15 skype chats open; this means you&#8217;re working hard. Chats, conference calls, video conferencing, mail, it all works, but the knowledge that is exchanged doesn&#8217;t stick. It&#8217;s lost after the conversation is over. Two or three people have learned something and then we go into the regular creating of presentations, text documents, mindmaps, etc.</p>
<p>But real knowledge should be shared with other people, discussed, enriched and USED! Wiki and blog give the company a way to do that. But then the employees still have to understand what they are doing. Don&#8217;t blog because your boss tells you to, don&#8217;t post something on wiki because it&#8217;s good for your bonus. It&#8217;s change in working: the knowledge in your head is worth nothing until you do something with it! Share the knowledge, actively join the discussion with other people in your company (our outside).</p>
<p>Me personally, I don&#8217;t have enough time to do all that shit&#8230; Ehm&#8230; Ah&#8230;.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s going to be a long way before this Enterprise 2.0 thing will really work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://martinnotes.com/2008/04/20/enterprise-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

