<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Martin Notes &#187; Enterprise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://martinnotes.com/tag/enterprise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://martinnotes.com</link>
	<description>Open source in real life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:44:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Enterprise performance</title>
		<link>http://martinnotes.com/2008/10/31/enterprise-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://martinnotes.com/2008/10/31/enterprise-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinnotes.com/?p=86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been working with a lot of enterprise software during my whole career and it keep surprising me that almost no enterprise tool has any consideration for performance. I understand that the pricing is usually per CPU, which makes performance a less interesting feature for sales. But it goes too far. How is it possible [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been working with a lot of enterprise software during my whole career and it keep surprising me that almost no enterprise tool has any consideration for performance. I understand that the pricing is usually per CPU, which makes performance a less interesting feature for sales. But it goes too far.</p>
<p>How is it possible that you are advised to run 1 Oracle  WebLogic Portal instance on 1 CPU? I know portal is not comparable to PHP, but a factor 1:1000 is a bit to much for my liking. And Oracle is not alone in this: IBM, SAP, all of these are slow and slower. And it&#8217;s weird since we (the IT boys and girls) have fixed this a long time ago.</p>
<p>There is a beautiful concept called HTML caching. Yes, I know: that&#8217;s not nice, architectural incorrect, not flexible enough. Indeed, heavily personalised pages might not be the primary candidates for full page caching, but most of the websites out there still use a fairly static homepage. Cache that page!</p>
<p>At <a href="http://www.componence.com">Componence</a> we&#8217;ve (finally) delivered a standard caching solution to put in front of Oracle WebLogic Portal (or BEA Weblogic Portal and the result is shocking. The performance improvement is upwards of 1:20. Give it a try: <a href="http://www.wk-vet.fr">http://www.wk-vet.fr</a>. Yes, that&#8217;s portal, and it&#8217;s dynamic.</p>
<p>Dear enterprise architects, please stop being such principle asses and apply the most common fixes to your performance problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://martinnotes.com/2008/10/31/enterprise-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

